See the argument.
Not the summary.

can’t distinguish the speaker’s opinion from a cited fact

miss contradictions within the source material

miss the insight, context, or nuance that changes the meaning

Drop a link

Paste any YouTube URL or search directly from the app. Talks, interviews, podcasts, documentaries — anything with speech.

We transcribe & extract

Full transcript pulled, then a frontier AI model identifies every distinct claim, who said it, and how each one logically relates to the others.

Choose a lens

Argument graph for structure. Epistemic Terrain for certainty. Steelman for what the strongest critic would say. Switch freely — the underlying data is the same.

Explore the map

Every claim links to the ideas it supports, challenges, or qualifies — and to the verbatim timestamp where it was said. No paraphrase. No interpretation.

Argument Topology

The logical scaffold no one can hold in their head.

Every claim becomes a node. Every dependency becomes a typed edge — supports, attacks, qualifies, depends. Load-bearing claims highlighted: pull them out and the argument collapses.

Epistemic Terrain

Fact, consensus, contested, or speculation — color-coded across the whole conversation.

The certainty heatmap the rationalist community has been hand-writing as “epistemic status” headers for a decade — now generated automatically, per claim.

Blindspot

The perspectives, populations, and considerations the speakers never addressed.

Principles

The underlying rules the speakers operate from — even when they don’t name them.

Timeline

Every claim in the order it was said, each anchored to a verbatim timestamp.

Power

Who benefits if these claims are accepted? What incentives are speaking?

Prerequisites

Every concept you needed to know to fully understand this conversation.

Implications

The downstream consequences of each claim — what follows if they’re true.

Steelman

The strongest version of the counter-argument they should have heard.

History

How this debate has been argued before — and what’s been settled.

Power listeners of Lex, Dwarkesh, Tyler, EconTalk, 80,000 Hours

If you finish a three-hour interview wanting to argue with it, not summarize it, you are the target user.

The rationalist & forecasting community

Every claim tagged for certainty. Every counter-argument steelmanned. The “epistemic status” header you’ve been writing manually for a decade — now automatic.

Researchers & academics

Map the argumentative structure of an entire lecture series. Compare how different speakers handle the same claims.

Journalists & analysts

Every claim, traced to its source. Every assumption, made explicit. Fact-check at the level of individual assertions.

Founders & operators

Watch a 3-hour investor talk in 10 minutes. Extract signal from keynotes, panels, and podcasts without sitting through the runtime.

No AI hosts — pretending to discuss your podcast in two voices that say “deep dive” forty times before they get to anything.

No paraphrased summaries — that read like ChatGPT compressed the speaker’s voice into a textbook table of contents.

No claims that don’t link to a source — every node in every lens points to the exact timestamp where it was said. If we can’t cite it, we don’t surface it.

No “you might also like” — Noeverse is a comprehension tool, not a recommendation engine. You bring the video. We render its structure. That’s it.

10 credits/month · €0.30 per analysis

Ideal for occasional deep-dives into long-form content.

• ✓10 video analyses / month
• ✓All ten lenses on every video
• ✓Verbatim timestamps on every claim
• ✓Shareable links
• ✓Joint Projects

40 credits/month · €0.22 per analysis

For researchers, journalists, and knowledge workers who live in video.

• ✓40 video analyses / month
• ✓All ten lenses on every video
• ✓Verbatim timestamps on every claim
• ✓Shareable links
• ✓Joint Projects (unlimited)

20 credits · €0.30 each

45 credits · €0.27 each

120 credits · €0.25 each